Recently I was contacted by Don Thule regarding a prototype Tank-Rule he had been working on in the early '70s. The prototype is shown below. Apparently, this was an attempt to merge digital readouts with the versatility of a handheld slide rule (for night-time or low-light-level reading of scales). Don's story is quite interesting … .
"
I was a research assistant working on this project about
April 1971, I think. At that time I was working for
Lockheed on a Defense Department project designed to
provide some improvements in computational power for
tank crews.
Our initial goal was to provide an electronic calculating device
for use by tank gunners and crew, generally for calculating ammunition
trajectories. This task generally had to be performed
in poor lighting conditions, perhaps under battle conditions with
emergency lighting only.
The task was approached from several angles... We looked at the
available devices which could achieve our aims, including off-the-shelf
calculators. At that stage, scientific calculators were not available,
and definitely not specialist electronic computation devices as capable
as the many military slide rules and conversion widgets which were
available.
Our research was divided into two areas; the first was to
test the practicality of producing a scientific hand-held calculator,
the second was to provide minimal electronic readout functionality
to existing mechanical devices (ie: the general purpose and function
specific slide rules). Early on, we realised we did not have the
capability to produce a scientific hand-held calculator in the time
available, or with the resources at hand. This team (tiger team one)
was wound up approximately April 1970. I was on this second tiger team.
We developed several prototypes - using gas-fluorescent display technology
and simple electronics (there were no microprocessors or ICs available at
this stage), and what now seems like extremely primitive technology.
The basic device was a simple resistance measuring circuit. The resistance
was scaled and displayed as a 4 digit number (0 to 9999), with an implied
decimal point (ie: 0.000 to 9.999). The rule was specially coated with
resistive material to allow a simple 1:1 correspondence between the position
of the cursor on the scale and the readout produced by the resistive circuit.
Unfortunately this coating process was time consuming, expensive, and highly
inaccurate.
Typically, linear scales were a breeze.. a simple layer of resistive
material was placed along the entire length of the back-side of the rule
in the same position as the scale (the rules we produced were single-sided).
Logarithmic scales were more tricky; we had to develop a deposition process
which would produce a coating of resistive material which would
accurately mirror the scale values along the rule. We spent approximately
2 years developing these processes, and only managed to achieve an accuracy
of about 5%. There was a lot of pressure to perform, as the Defense department
was spending a lot of money on this project ($3.2 million 1971 dollars) up to
the time of cancellation (see below).
We had significant other problems, apart from the resistive coating... power
consumption being the major one. Due to the dual-nature of the display circuitry
and the heavy power drain of the fluorescent tubules, we typically achieved
40-60 minutes of continuous operation on 2 AA cell batteries. This capacity
was below the required capability of a portable calculatiion device for use in
battle situations, but we were saved by the fact that the device was primarially
intended for use in tanks. We added a recharging circuit, converted the cells
to rechargeables, and used a standard car cigarette-lighter attachment to provide
the power conversion (yes, tanks DO have cigarette lighter connections). So...
the general approach was to leave the device connected to the recharging
circuit while it was not in use... and then disconnect it for battle situations.
Unfortunately, this was the cause of the first major mishap for the program,
and almost caused the immediate cancellation of the program. One of the test
crews, using our device and charger in a tank during one of the war-game exercises,
left the device connected to the charger during a long quiescent period. Our
recharging circuit managed to entirely drain the tank's batteries and left one
tank and crew stationary, helpless and unable to start their tank. The device
did, however, produce the most accurate calculations to date, and thus saved
the program by the skin of its teeth.
We were blown out of the water by the introduction of the Hewlett Packard HP35
scientific calculator in about 1972. I remember it well, the resigned feeling around
the office after John Loof (my immediate boss) brought in the first one
and we spent the day marvelling over it. Our project was cancelled about
a week later, filed away in boxes and sent to the army. I souveniered this
photograph of the last prototype we made; i have the actual device somewhere in
my garage, but i haven't had it out for 20 years. The picture you see shows the
dual-readout cursor, with several buttons to control the display circuitry.
Included there are simple add and subtract buttons (the current reading could
be accumulated to achieve automatic multiplication/division), a few reset buttons
and one for displaying the scale value or the inverse scale value. In all,
with the last prototype... we were nearly there... and I was sorry that this
device never reached the mainstream.. it was just a few years too late.
My wife, April Thule, finally convinced me that this should see the light of day.